- It's better than the Far Cry 3 co-op campaign (although more buggy) - a step in the right direction at least. - Vehicles (except the glider) as designed with co-op in mind. - The game has its fun moments for sure. Cons: - The campaign doesn't work in co-op. co-op only works for the open world stuff. - You can't play co-op right away. The grind for bushman and the gun on it's own are worth it, as the arena progress is tied to your account, not the save game, so the only thing you need to do in the next save game after grinding the 10 arena levels in the previous save game is to do the first yogi & reggie mission and then do 1 arena fight on the side and you have the bushman
Though I did like Far Cry 4's story, I think Far Cry 3 was more enjoyable, and it has some interesting moments of deconstruction and far better character development on the part of the protagonist. If you can't get 3 for some reason, 4's story is alright, nothing too special, but the basic story isn't too bad, the villain is entertaining, and
Far cry 3 is a blast too play. Its story is mediocre at best but it's a blast to blow things up in both standard and unique ways and by that I mean attaching an explosive barrel to a statue. Far cry has better graphics and a better story. To enjoy a game for being a game just cause To enjoy a story while having some fun far cry
This game feels more like Ghost Recon: Wildlands than it does a Farcry. Basically this. Yeah the weapons/gun mechanics arent as refined as a GR would require them to be, and there's still the usual amount of Far Cry silly, but it doesn't feel like a far cry so much as it does GR: W. Wow. That’s a huge compliment to FC6.
Imo Far Cry 5 is much better than 4 but I'd go with playing the games in order lf release since you already started with 3. Far Cry 3 is still by far the best in the series for me and 5 is the next best thing. Far Cry 4 is very similar to 3 and doesn't really try to be it's own game. It's a good game but it's my least favorite in the series.

So Far Cry 4 was probably better (semi-)objectively, because it built on Far Cry 3 and improved slightly, but those improvements pale in comparison to the impact Far Cry 3's blueprint had. Not to mention, the two games differed in location, so personal preference plays a role too.

Best. Dewrito • i7-4770k + AMD R9 290 • 9 yr. ago. All Gameworks features in FC4 are half-baked/poorly implemented. God Rays = yellow haze all over the screen, lose volumetric fog. TXAA = bad coverage, even SMAA is better quality. HBAO+ = 3x slower than SSBC for a slight IQ increase and poor coverage.

3. refarico • 4 yr. ago. Yes, it is. I have played both with an Intel 6600K and a AMD 3700X (RTX 2600) 1080p@120 and FC5 reaches higher FPS and better average frametimes in both CPUs, with a similar high settings configuration settings and VRAM usage. I think improvements in the engine are coming from Primal though. 2.

It’s hard to make graphics as good as the last of us 2 graphics for an open world game like far cry 6 and the last of us also had more time in development so that is the answer. They did a better job before with far cry 5 and far cry 4. Hell even the far cry 3 character faces looked better.
Yes and no. Farcry 4 has a lot more awe inspired scenes. Farcry 5 is more straight to the point farcry, just loot and shoot for freedom in hope county usa. Farcry 4 however has less multiplayer. It's hard to say which is more worth buying. far cry 6 seems like a redemption of farcry 2 so I'd wait until 6. 7 if you're patient.
.
  • 3p2gtvl6x0.pages.dev/429
  • 3p2gtvl6x0.pages.dev/234
  • 3p2gtvl6x0.pages.dev/6
  • 3p2gtvl6x0.pages.dev/251
  • 3p2gtvl6x0.pages.dev/385
  • 3p2gtvl6x0.pages.dev/403
  • 3p2gtvl6x0.pages.dev/218
  • 3p2gtvl6x0.pages.dev/144

    • is far cry 4 better than 3